Discussions
1.
Religion and Beliefs
2.
Authors are all American, does that make the
text biased?
3. Is ICU subversive?
4.Is it possible to incorporate this textbook to present day
japan?
5. Overall
1. Religion and Belief
When you think of
religion as simple as a belief then the hypothesis may make itself out to be
true. However, religion is much more complex and different that we need to
distinct it from other beliefs.
For instance, the
question to whether Jesus Christ actually existed is impossible to answer with
logical explanation. Some people believe he did and actually worship him while
some cast doubts. As Take explained during our discussion, religion is a
spiritual matter and we cannot discuss a spiritual matter the same way as we
discuss laws and politics. To simplify matters, lets say I killed a friend. Why
is that bad? Of course we know it’s wrong to kill a person but there is no
logical explanation towards it. It is because of our morals and our feelings
that we cannot seem to explain in simple words.
All in all, I do not
think that Meiland is contradicting himself by being a Christian and also
necessitating proof and reasons because the two are completely different
matters.
2.
Authors are all American, does that make the
text biased?
Overall, the content
seemed very western. Unlike ICU, most colleges in Japan do not conduct office
hours (mentioned in 1-27) nor do they have an environment where students feel
free to ask questions during class (mentioned in 1-25) what with over 100
students in one classroom. In a general sense, the suggestions written in the
text may be the ideal way one student should perceive college but it is not
applicable to all colleges.
3.
Is ICU subversive?
The ideal answer
would be no but at the same time I also think that it is
impossible for any institution to not be subversive. Every institution has a
purpose and ICU has one as well. As written in the homepage of ICU, the ICU’s
purpose is ‘cultivating
capable individuals, educated as internationally minded citizens, who will
serve both God and people and who will contribute to lasting peace.’ Just as Rab stated, all professors who are tenured
have to be Christians. This contradicts to the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights which we all signed, but if we think about this for a moment and imagine
ICU where all tenured professors didn’t have to be Christians, then we could
easily see that it is possible for every professor in ICU to become atheists.
This would be a problem since ICU’s purpose is to cultivate individuals who
will serve both God and people.
ICU is an amazing university where people
respect each others’ differences but even an institution like this, is
subversive.
4. Is it possible to incorporate this text to present day
Japan?
It seems impossible
at the moment. As Rab stated his experiences in other colleges, the educational
system in Japan is being left behind other colleges around the globe. However,
it is not just about the educational system but it is also about the kids as
well. Say the Japanese government decided to higher the budget for colleges and
improved the systems; would the kids be ready for it? These kids spent 12 years
in classrooms taking very passive classes and had always perceived studying as a
‘memory challenge.’ Also, in general, Japanese college students have a low
motivation towards learning at college. They think of the four years at college
as a ‘summer break from their lives’ as Yuka stated. Some say college is merely
the process of getting a job.
If we are going to
change the ways of colleges, then we have to change the students who will be
learning there, which leads to the idea that we need to change the educational
system from a young age. We need more active education in elementary schools,
Junior high schools and high schools. Finally, we need a different entrance
exam system for colleges.
If we are able to
achieve all of the above then it may be possible to incorporate the text to
Japan but it seems unlikely that the educational systems will be changing in
Japan anytime soon.
5.
Overall
Overall,
the class was very thought provoking and made me think up to the point to say
that ICU was subversive. It is strange to be saying that since a few months
ago, I basically worshipped this school and was willing to do anything to pass
the test but here I am now, calling this school subversive. However, I think
this is one of the best things of the ELA classes and other classes at ICU as
well. They let you be critical and actually find these contradictions externally
as well as internally. I am excited to see what the rest of the classes brings
to me.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿